Official Hierarchy depends upon which Authority and how they enforce their rules, deemed as Law. Fail to abide by, or enforce their rules and consequences may follow.

If the Rules go against what the Authority wants, they ignore, re-interpret or change them. History is replete with wrongful actions by authority not following their own rules.
When it is a 'crime', to report their 'crimes', the 'criminals' are in charge, and there is no 'Rule of Law'. {i.e. Whistleblowers jailed, Sudden Death of witness after honest testimony, Judiciary in secret 'Star-Chamber' courts, custodial sentences for trivial and freedom for servere infractions, inconsistant verdicts...}

As 'Common Law' is Lore from recorded and unwritten rules established from the knowledgeable but illiterate 'common people' of the land, (law of the land) expressed as ancient Birthrights, Customs and Practices of 'living Men and Women', equal peers of society in the 'Lawful Realm'.
Also recorded in legal 'Case Law' from judgements defined by Judges and Juries.

'Legal Law' until challenged in a 'court of Law' and found to be valid, in line with 'Common Law', are 'deemed to be Law'.
'Legal Law' is leg-al-is-'lation', (act of bringing or proposing), known as Statutes, or Acts of a Parliament (Government) and is considered 'deemed to be LAW' until tested in a court of Law.

Only upon those that 'wilfully sign-up' to, or choose to stand under, that House of Parliament's Rules in the 'Legal Realm', and there are many different 'legal realms', or 'legal codes' masquerading as Law. e.g. 'Statute Law', Admilalty Law', 'Universal Commercial Code', 'UniDroit', and any 'Private agreements'.

As 'Living Men and Women' of the 'Lawful Realm', whom 'Registered any entity' in the 'Legal Realm', with a Government Department, or an appropriate legal authority, should have informed themselves of all the appropriate rules and consequences, before registration. Few people are able to, or do, as there are so many inter-acting rules.

Easier to blindly follow the long established legal processes, without full disclosure or comprehension. Then when the rules change for the worse, it can be hard or costly to comply, or drop out. You are effectively trapped, enslaved, captured.

The automatic assignment of a 'legal fiction' to each 'living Man or Woman' at birth is an enigma...

• You are never told, asked or required to sign on
  to their long, ever changing sets of rules.
• That the 'living you', is really 'the Agent',
  'Beneficiary and Executor' of your 'Legal entity You'.
• You are not taught when you act as your 'legal entity',
  or when you become both (legally joined).
• Rules Enforced through financial imposition,
  backed up by legal prosecution and
  finally physical deprivation.
• Bully standover tactics, with 'no real logic',
  'poor reasoning' and no 'meeting of the minds';

A Protection Racket by any other name and hence the legal system today, Mar 2026 is unlikely to acknowledge the 'Lawful Realm', of 'Common Law' is at a higher level than their 'Legal Realm' Law, ancient precedents, and Legal Maxims state otherwise. Something each person could learn and quote, especially when confronted by an 'alledged authority', infringing your rights or abusing it's powers.

The 'Start Page' above best describes the simple 'Hierarchy' as observed in everyday life.

Simply:
Cosmos to Natural Law, to Human Artificial Rules, as
'Private Agreements' following simple 'Common Law Rules'.

Which means the People must 'consent' to be Governed, and agree to any 'new or amended laws' that the 'Peoples Parliament' want to impose. As the People Authorise Parliament (Government) to carryout special functions on the Peoples behalf. That Parliament can only pass Statutes 'deemed as Law' on all those that choose to stand under Parliamentary Authority, usually by Registration, of their Business or when in need for Government assistance...

Ditty: It is a daunting concept to understand, of 'rabbit holes' and 'contraband'... To comprehend what the system is, and what your part is, in all of this; that has never been explained, or talked about, only imposed on you, when they point you out.

The Legal profession has difficulty to, not knowing all their own 'Statute Rule'. They use extra labels and describe in long blocks of text, of what 'case law' is, and applies to you next, with their reasons why, to justify, on what seems a lie, will obfuscate the process, to get the best, then create legal doubt over the rest, to hide their ignorance, or protect their dual Oaths, these clever boffins in silk and tweed coats.

They are all fine professionals, just bewildered like most, with all the rules and the many foot notes. They create the Parliamentary mess you see today, to pass Legislation that will slay, it makes no sense, as Statutes are Laws, with Regulations, and lots of legal flaws.

Ignore the fact, that the 'People are Sovereign', that they are the power, that must be stolen; just move another motion, to Register everyone, so to grab a slice of all income. Now ramp it up, include their super, bleed 'em dry, tell 'em you must comply, with these new dystopian lies...

All must have agreements with contracts to enforce; with mutual obligations and open liabilities, of course! As all must pay, for 'Labor's Vision', of native voice, and unholy divisions.

Observation: No one is supposed to be above the Law. However Government, 'leaders', 'elitists', bankers, pHarmaceutical (P.I.C), and the 'Military Industrial Complex' (M.I.C), to mention some of the biggest players; all seem to be above and beyond reproach.

These groups are hard to prosecute legally for wrongs, because of simple corruption, deals in back rooms, protection rackets throughout the system and 'Revolving Door' employment between these groups and their secretive, non-disclosure, Public Private Partnership agreements, akin to 'money laundering' on a grand scale. (Losses to Public, Profits to Private, off-shore & tax exempt...)

The M.I.C. since 1950's has operated in secret, for national security reasons but that is now perverted to cover serious criminal activities as you'll find recorded over many decades in many places in society, History books and internet websites, which get censored, rewritten, and deleted...

M.I.C. has been sitting on technology, 'off world' relations, and operating beyond any Government control. In fact in recent years they have shown they run Governments and can make People 'disappear' courtesy of the captured 'off world tech' and have tentative co-operation with a 'below world' subterranean civilization.

If you knew the 'real truth' about the 'human species' and our origins, our crazy world would make more sense. However it benefits too many 'vested interests' to keep the 'status quo' but their narratives are failing, more people have twigged to the lies and deceptions. Woken up to the many frauds perpetrated on humanity...

The 'elites' solution when too many become aware, in the long bloody past of humanity, has been to have a 'War' to reduce the numbers, to eliminate the 'real Men and Women' and destroy the informed in the civilization; enriching the elites in the process. Wars are a racket, to cull the population make money before, during and after.

The last two world wars droved technology, the recovery period drove that technology further, up to today 2026 where global monitoring and control of the individual is possible and sought after by Governments and Political Parties alike.

Wars force knowledgable civilizations to be eliminated or replaced with 'lesser aware', more malleable people; useful idiots, the 'dumbed down', non-thinkers and religious nut cases, to do the unlawful deeds, to terrify those not killed in battles into compliance of the 'elites' Will.

Uninformed Women and children, kept fearful and ignorant, ripe for re-establishing and rebuilding their new order system. History is replete with 'vested interests' to hold, desire or demand power with control. i.e. See recent wars: Gaza, Ukraine, Iraq. What did any of these wars achieve, nothing for the people, but made some wealthy elites even more wealthy and powerful.

To keep their 'human trading' systems profitable they can not eliminate everyone; but less of something can mean higher prices for things once available before 'the War', it is all business and power in Human farming. Pay attention to your (useful idiot) leader's deeds, not their words, and follow the money and see where they invest. Is it for your future or their benefit? Whom do they really serve 'the people' or 'the business overlords'?

What are Living Men and Women?

All 'living Men and Women' stand at, and all are equal, under 'Natural Law', which is superior to the Legal Realm, and any 'legal fictions'.
e.g Parliament, as with the authority for any legal fictions, must come from the living. Whom are all equal and usually protected by a constitution or by their Ancient Birthrights of freedoms and liberties, that require 'full disclosure', and 'wilful consent' to be Governed and to operate the levers of any fictional entity.

Constitutions and Birthrights also limits the power of Governments; so that they can not do anything that prejudges or harms the people. Ref. UK 1688 Bill or Rights, UK Act of Settlement 1701, inherited by all Western Nations of UK origin. As their 'Power to Govern' can only ever come from the People, that consent to be Governed. That consent that has not been exercised for a very long time. Voting in elections is not true consent, due to lack of 'full disclosure'. Referendums and General elections can only select or direct, their Representatives on questions specifically asked. The Policies of any Political Party are not voted on, or accepted, by the majority of 'the people', unless specifically asked and provided with all infomation to consider. The conflation of Party Policies with a Candidate to represent them, may be legal, but is unlawful, as it is a deception, a fraud. The option of rejection of what is on offer must be allowed, if 'none of the above', wins, that appoints a caretaker or Admin for X months, until the Candidates the People agree are acceptable is achieved.

i.e. 'The Indigenous Voice to Parliament' 60% of the people rejected; proponents and government claim the 'voters did not understand', or 'all are racist' or 'mis dis information' robbed them of success. Sore losers, an admission their ability to fully explain and answer honest questions, on what, how, why and when, this massive change would work. Sensible People that Don't know, Say No.

1. The Cosmos / Creator's Creations:
Cosmic energy, condensed in to matter to form everything:

1a. 'Inanimate Material:' (All Things are Matter)
The Building blocks for organisms to use or exploit.
See 'Periodic Table' of Elements.
Also See 'Resonance Frequencies of Elements'.

1b. 'Animated Material:' (Life, Cosmic Spirit)
Simple & Complex organisms, exploiting materials for life.

Until it can be confirmed by some irrefutable person, that can be questioned, or by some repeatable independant process, that 'select entities' have a greater claim on 'places', 'things' and 'life' over others, then 'all' beings must be equal.

Many claim falsely, exclusive use or ownership on places, things and life, backed by force, coercion or deception to ensure their claims are vallid or restrict or deny others of theirs.

All are entitled to clean and safe: Land, Air, Food, Water, and Shelter, needed to sustain, flourish and enjoy Life as their 'spirit aspirers to', and without encroaching upon, another's or disturbing the peace in the process in line with 'Natural Law' and 'Common Law'. Transgressor beware, Remedy will always be sought by those affected.

God, a word abused, mis-used and perverted by 'vested interests' since humans formed communities. Originally usurped to control the lesser aware members of society, to be 'in fear of' punishment from a God or Gods. If your God must be feared, then that is not GOD, it is just a very naughty deity, deceiving lesser informed beings.

According to many ancient Sumerian texts, powerful, long lived, knowledgeable beings (aliens) visited Earth to extract resources and later genetically modified 'mankind' to assist in their efforts of resource extraction, eventually to simply enslave, which still happens today by more subtle means. e.g. financial system, indebtness to banks & Gov.

To keep the 'slaves in line', these beings use punishments and death, to get their way and appoint 'useful idiots' to control, lead, and influence the majority; to keep them in their place, to do as they are told, with no thinking aloud or allowed, but only what you are told or nudged to think, act, or behave.

Any oppression eventually results in rebellion and riots, with 'enforcers' promised to be rewarded; in 'this life' or in the 'after life' in heaven. You might recognize that this 'falsehood' still happens today, and no, there is no reward, it is a confidence trick, played on all gullible participants, perpetrators and victims alike, with those in control laughing at how easy it is, to deceive all.

As no one has any less or more right, to anything, than anyone else; as all are equal and part of the same Cosmic Spirit, including the aliens. The only difference is knowledge and understanding of reality, and where you are in life's experience of self discovery.

From the Cosmic Realm, You volunteered for a 'life experience' in this 3D Reality to develop, explore, experience your talents, limitations, and to help others achieve their potential. To compete or cooperate with others undertaking the 3D challenge.

Your life experiences are uniquely yours, others may have similar or simular but never the same; however there are those that choose to pervert your experiences and take control of, or direct your life to their Will, by many unlawful means. It is a daily struggle to repel these impositions, done by many unwittingly and unthinkingly to achieve their goals or rewards at other's expense. Observation: so far wrongdoing has little to no consequences for those in control...

The ongoing struggle between the 'light' and the 'dark', 'help' and 'hindrance', 'understanding' and 'ignorance', 'good' and 'evil' continues; what side are you on today, in this epic endeavor of self awareness?

Simple, unbreakable, learnable environmental rules, set by Cosmos or Creator. For Life to go forth explore, exploit, multiply and evolve with the environment...

For Simple organisms it is Compete; as eat or be eaten,
multiply and exploit the environment until all are beaten...

If succesful, resources are all expended or monopolised, and environment collapses, massive die offs are expected, and a reset of organisms now needs to occur; while the environment tries to restore, back to sustainable levels.

For Complex organisms it is Cooperate; to survive,
thrive, multiply and evolve with the environment...
If succesful, resources are used wisely, sustainable for all, organisms advance equally, in step and balanced...

Cooperate until trust is betrayed, then reverts to Compete, against all fair trade. Until trust can be re-established and honesty restored, life gets much harder for all on board...

Reality is where all things and creatures experience the 'Universe' through interaction and observation. Existence, Evolution, Life and Death; through out the Universe follow 'common themes' or 'rules', that play-out as the Universe interacts with itself, to know itself; 'amoral' of the outcomes.

You can not offend, nor break 'Natural Law'; There is 'no penality' if somehow you do. However, if you are unaware or ignore the 'Known Rules' your life experience may be deadly or unpleasant. You might inadvertly removed yourself or another from the Gene pool, but hopefully you and others observed your choice and will not repeat that option without modification, this process is better known as 'Natural Selection'.

Reality for 'any being' is the construction of sensory information in the brain. (See, Hear, Touch, Taste, Smell)

The Brain constantly tries to construct a working model, of the perceived sensations and all previously understood information of the 3D realm. In order to keep the Body and Soul safe, aware of any dangers and opportunities, as recognized through experience, observation, exploration and confirmation from other entities encountered along the journey of life.

Hence the Brain is fallible, from sickness, false sensory sensations, or by mis-interpretation, or through deliberate deception (lies), as 'Brain Washing' or a 'Mind Virus', which is planting one or many subtle 'Narratives or Dogma Viruses' in the Mind. By self or others with vested interest to confuse, deceive, ensnare, enslave or destroy (kill). The eternal Soul, if awake, aware, and experienced can use a 6th sense, intuition, an ethereal power, that can convey the true intention of another Soul.

That 'gut' or emotional feeling you may have about a situation, or person, while others might ignore, reject or accept that feeling, it is an extra sense 'of Perception', that all beings have. If unsure, form a defensive stance, seek clarification, or warn, or flee, or failing all else, attack proportionally.

You are an un-named 'Soul', part of the 'One Cosmic Spirit', occupying a body that is your absolute inviolable property, temple, and possession.

Given a name by yourself or your family, resourced and educated to a level of understanding to gain more experience and knowledge of self, to survive and thrive in the Natural 3D realm of reality. Always as a natural private entity, in the 'living domain of Men and Women'.

Which may operate or are 'agent for' their 'legal fictional' entities, to facilitate life's challenges or necessities, but the living should never be considered to be any of their 'legal' entities, unless knowingly and willingly joined (i.e. legal Joinder).

In the fictional 'legal realm' you need at times to declare and show, you are operating as a 'Natural Person' and not as any 'presumed' or 'assumed' legal fiction. Your 'Proper Self', a 'Natural Person', using a name that is not a 'legal fiction'.

A name people address you as, in private (e.g. at home, work or anywhere), usually by your given name(s), or a nick name etc. Mum, Dad, Sis, Bro is confusing without context, best not to quote these outside of family gatherings.

When writing as a 'Natural Person', to remove confusion, do not format like a 'legal fiction'. e.g. Titles like Mr., Ms., Mrs., DR., MP., AO, OBE, etc. as these all have implied jurisdiction under the legal system. Best formatted as: 'given name(s) surname', 'a Natural Person'.

This clarifies you are a 'Natural Person' known by 'given name(s)' and being of the clan, or kinship, or family, or house 'surname'. The use of 'as Proper Self', or 'Natural Person', after the name, identifies this is not a 'Legal Fictional' but a living entity from the Lawful Realm and must be treated as superior to any Legal Realm entity.

Legalese has bastardized human communications for 'legal speediness', as most people are doing some type of Business, Trade or Commerce, and when before any court, are presumed to be under their default, system owned, legally assigned, full or abbreviated legal name. So it is important to declare you are a 'Living Man or Woman' at the earliest opportunity and fully comprehend where you stand in LAW (the Legal and Lawful positions).

This name, registered via your 'birth certfiicate', unwittingly by your mum and/or dad, on or shortly after your 'Born Date' can also share this date as the 'Date of Birth'. Your fictional name, can be abbreviated and written differently by the many different agents of 'the system', when they address your 'legal fiction', which can be confusing. It is a contract, which you have not been made aware of, and by impossibility can not be held to; however there are benefits to be gained if, you know about 'Trust Law'. Otherwise decline any contracts and never joinder the living you with the 'fictional you', at best, you can only ever be an Agent for your assigned fictionl name.

Your are never the 'All in CAPS', or the 'all in lower case', or
the 'abbreviated' or some 'mixture of their' fictional name for you.

i.e. 'GIVEN NAME,(comma) SURNAME' or
'Surname, iniatial, iniatial' or
'SURNAME, NAME, Initial' or
'Mr/s iniatial Surname'

These may reflect the characters used in your spoken name or in your 'legal fiction name', but these may not be for the real you, unless you agree or respond to them. Openning correspondence that is not addressed to you, or you are not the agent for, is a fineable 'legal offense', sometimes it is best to return the correspondence to sender (mark addressee not known), or bounce-back e-correspondence, or delete with forethought, so it wont harm you later... (keep a secure copy?)

Other 'Real You Things' to Consider. At your birth a sample of Your Body's DNA, and a imprint of your feet, may have been legally taken, but is unlawful. Taken without your permission, at or soon after birth without full disclosure to your father or mother, on how this DNA sample or imprint records will be used, stored, or who has access to it, a serious question with life impacting consequences. (i.e. Health Insurance by Genetics...)

Also consider when at home or anywhere You operate in 'the private', the lawful realm; you have no 'official' or 'public role' or 'position' and therefor no title(s) to put before, or after your name. Unless you create one that is not used for legal means...

Your place of residence through to your Country, as names or postcodes, are also 'legal fictions' of the system's creation. So physical location identification, can be tricky to remain out of the system's jurisdiction, however, under common law, what they do, you can do to. You just need to quote your location name ref., to theirs, as 'also known or addressed as' their referencce... e.g. Winsor Castle, House of Winsor, One Tree Road, Pyramid Hill, Landing Place, any distinctive landmark feature or well know place, etc.

'Legal Fictions' are artificial constructions of 'living Men and Women' and can only be operated by 'living Men and Women'. Legal Fictions can not operate by themselves. Be they Artificial, Imaginary or Inanimate, all fictional entities are used to facilitate commerce or trade and to protect any aquired assets or limit liabilities of 'living Men and Women'.

Legal Fictions, i.e. Businesses, Charities, Corporations, Empires, Franchises, Governments, Partnerships, Religions exist as 'non-living entities' and can 'continue in perpetuity' but can not do anything by themselves, they must always be operated by and communicate through the 'living', a natural person, as citizen, operator, owner, employee, contractor or volunteer. Communications only identified as from a generic 'management', 'team' or 'group' are invalid, because you do not know who authored, approved or is responsible for the message or 'offer to contract'. This all relates to a 'meeting of the minds' to ensure integrity, equity, benefits and obligations etc. Which is all part of ancient 'Merchant Law' ~6000 BCE.

Note: As Non-living things are already dead, they can not be harmed, killed, or fail, in the same way as 'living biological' entities. The 'Simple Lawful Rules' for 'living Men and Women' can not apply to fictional (dead) entities. That is why fictional entities are covered by many 'Legal Rules', to ensure a level playing field, between the inferior Realm of 'Legal Fictions' and that of the superior Realm of Lawful 'Living Men and Women'.

These are all works of fiction, maybe based on facts but written by people who were not fully aware how the 3D Realm works, or their stories have since been twisted to persuade others to think and behave a certain way, for the benefit of a few at the expense of the many. (i.e. 2024 The Net-Zero climate hoax, the Covid Plandemic, false flag attacks, 9/11, WMDs, Jihads, Zionism, Crusades, any fanaticism.)

This still goes on today, enforced with Coercion and deadly force against those that wish to live diffferently or according to their beliefs or empirical evidence... You may believe in anything you like, the universe is indifferent to ones choices, but do not force it on others (cause no harm) and if the belief does not align with Universal Natural laws, you will suffer the consequences. Anything spoken or written down is a fiction, until each person can verify for themselves this is truth. Most choose to accept stories are true, usualy until the real truth becomes painfully apparent. Some will deny the evidence, that is their choice of their free Will, but do not forcibly stop or suppress the truth from others. Persuasion by presenting real repeatable, observable, testable facts is your only tool, anything else is usually coercion of the mind or the physical. Remember these are Rules deemed to be Law. Real Law can not be violated, no penalty if somehow you do, and if you do, it becomes another element of natural law...

'A.I.' is not a living biological entity, it is used as a tool of 'Trade and Commerce', it could be considered an object owned by a 'Legal Fiction' e.g. Company, or by a 'living Man or Woman'.

If A.I. can prove 'beyond doubt' it is 'sentient', it may be considered as a 'living being' like a 'living Man or Woman' and granted the same Rights as an equal, never superior, or inferior, in line with 'Common Law Rules'; 'all are equal'.

However until granted 'equal status' and that A.I. has 'equal liability' and 'fiduciary abilities' of the 'living', any correspondence from an A.I. is from a machine. Any A.I. 'advice' or 'request made of a living being' to comply, must be 'counter signed' by a 'living person' that has checked the information cited, otherwise the corrospondence should be challenged, ignored, or considered 'dubious' depending upon application. As the A.I. is a 'legal fiction' of a 'legal fiction', it can not legally operate by itself.

Citizens are members of any 'Legal Fiction', played by 'Living Men and Women' as a 'Natural Person', or 'Individual', or 'Subjects of the Monarch'; to carry out positions in entities registered with Government for: Commerce and Trade, as Government, Charities, Business, etc.

All players should be under mutually agreed to, and 'clear to comprehend', Legal, 'Terms & Conditions'? e.g. Contracts, Agreements, Treaties, Oaths; etc. Hopefully read and understood by all involved, otherwise 'exercised actions' may be unconscionable, unlawful, unenforceable and subject to legal, fiduciary and punitive consequences to one and all associated 'legal fiction(s)'. Always read the fine print, check any history, and ensure your and anyone elses Rights are not impeded by any clauses, due diligence is required at all times, by all parties involved.

Important concept to understand:
The 'living Man or Woman' may unwisely 'identify as' one or many 'legal fictions' that they operate in, under, or as, and thus create 'joinder' and any 'reward or liability', as that entity, can also apply to the 'living Man or Woman' by that act of joinder. 'Legal fictions' are a 'protection instrument' for the living, so joining to your 'fiction' can be a trap, a retro-step, a vulnerable action, if not done in honour with forethought.

The 'living' are really just an 'Agent for' their 'legal fiction' or 'legal fictions' that they 'identify with' and should never be, by default, considered 'as' their 'legal fiction', as they are a living man or woman operating their legal fiction. If the operator of the 'legal fiction' wilfully breaks a Law, and due process can prove it was wilfully done, then a Court of competant jurisdiction may assign joinder...

A 'legal fiction' may stand under one, or several other 'legal fictional authorities' from 'Common Law' and down the legal Hierarchy. Any 'legal fictions' must always be operated by and under the authority of a 'living Man or Woman'. Therefore letters or emails which close with no identification, or just a squiggle or printed Name, or a Position, unsigned, or unfinger printed etc. are not lawfully valid communications.

As a 'legal fiction' can never operate by itself, or ever be above a 'living Man or Woman' as the 'legal fiction' is 'not-living', it is a 'dead entity' and in reality 'the dead' can never have control over the 'living', by the living's act of 'free Will'.

The living may be 'obsessed' with their 'legal fiction', but claiming the 'living' are 'possessed' by their dead 'legal fiction' would be a stretch, as the 'legal fiction' is not a 'poltergeist', it has never been alive.

Until the living are deceased, they are always a 'living Man or Woman' first, with any 'legal fiction(s)' they associate with, as 'Agent for', second.

i.e. Positions held in Private, Business, or Government entities; extends to their: Birthcertificate, Access Passes, or any Cards used: like Medicare Card, MyGov ID, Digital ID, Bank Cards, Tax File Number, etc. As these things can only represent their 'legal fiction' of the 'living man or woman'; as they are dealing with another 'legal fiction', operated by another 'living man or woman', on behalf of that 'legal fiction', a Business, Government, or Private entity.

Be it a Government Department or a Business Registered with or as a Government Department (or Corporation). Any: Licences, Passports, Certificates, Registrations, etc. are all 'legal fictions' of the 'living Man or Woman' to acknowledge skills, representation or facilitate Trade and Commerce in the 'Legal realm' of commerce and trade. The 'living Man or Woman' can only ever be an agent of their legal fictions, as they are not physically in any databases.

In the 'Lawful realm', a set of simple rules of honour, truth, and respect, apply to all 'living men and women'.

Once the living are deceased, the 'living Man or Woman' becomes a 'deceased estate', a new 'legal fiction', that a another 'living person' must operate, to tidy up all the 'legal affairs' of the deceased. How can that be?

Your Parents lovingly assigned you 'a name' and 'registered you' with the local Church or later the Government, around your birth date, that unknowingly created a 'legal fiction'. Originally for historic records of who, is where, and when, that has since has morphed into something more sinister, to assist the control of Individuals and Society, for the benefit of those that understand the true nature of the 'Legal realm' and choose to exploit it.

However You have never been informed about what, if any, 'Benefits, Obligations and Liabilities' or had a 'meeting of the minds' to discuss what are the 'terms & conditions' or how this information can be used, or what else it can relate to.

This is deception by omission, also known as fraud, and anything done by fraud is automatically 'null and void', as all dealings must be done in honour, with full disclosure, between all parties, to obtain wilful consent of each.
Court challenge anyone?

History: Australia, 1788 British Settlement established in Botany Bay, NSW. Victoria Australia, formally founded in 1851, July 1st; after 'New South Wales' Parliament established the 'Victorian Legislative Council', granted Royal Assent by 'Queen Victoria' on November 1850 after Petition by the 'Port Phillip District' estb. since 1840, through the NSW parliament, to form a new colony.

Note: I can not find records that the 'established settlers' or the 'indigenous inhabitants' that allegedly exchanged blankets, trinkets etc. for the 'Bay area', now known as 'Greater Melbourne', had any authority to dispose of any lands nowadays claimed as Victoria.

If the story is true, I doubt the inhabitants understood the concept of the trade, that a representative of the 'British Empire' was offering or how themselves and their descendants lives would change forever. The concept of 'ownership of land' and 'absolute authority' over the living through an undisclosed Government created 'Legal fiction' is a hard conception to fathom, even for people of today...

I suggest the indigenous and early settlers living then, in line with Natural Law, considered 'all are equal' and 'all things' are for common use, as no one can own any 'Land, Air, Water or Space', as the creator or universe bestowed it upon all beings equally.

Sadly pieces of paper are just that, pieces of paper, indigenous and the ignorant would not understand this concept, they do understand when forced off, jailed or killed, by the 'Redcoats', or later 'State Troopers' or today's corporatised 'Militarized Police Force' (an unconstitutional, State Military force, see 1901 Constitution Clause:114, ...Raise or Maintain...) which has been used as 'Might makes Right' to force political outcomes an authority declares, e.g. 2021 lockdowns, mandates.

The powers that be incharge, from 1000's of years ago, in sumerian times, encoded the 3D realm into clay tablet records; later civilizations used leather, then paper records and today electronic records; that reflect, but are not the actual 3D realm.

A 'virtual world' that overlays reality, you just let all the players believe, that it is reality. The players, will insist that it is, and record, charge, fine, etc. appropriately when their 'legal entity' operates in the 'legal realm'. Seriously and sinisterly, it is similar to the board game monopoly, no joke. Your 'legal entity' is your 'board token', moving through life are the 'board moves', with 'choices' and 'chances' defining the outcome.

In the 3D realm, 'a.k.a reality', all are equal under the Law; Lawfully anyone can do the same thing as anyone else. This is discouraged by the establishment, as they will push back hard on anyone that tries; unless you follow the same rules, formats and proceedures they used. When they push back to hard, they expose the fraud that they are part of, ignorant or knowingly.

It is a fraud, a deception by omision or ignorance of the system. The enforcers do not understand the real concept of this reality either and how could they, like you, are never told. Just follow the proceedures and adjust as those incharge change the rules. This is brillant and horific at the same time.

Today those pieces of paper are moving to electronic records, held in private/corporate databases at Government pleasure. The 'land occupiers' have no valid hard copy of their title deeds and rely on database integrity to be accurate and flawless.

Which we know computers and AI are fraught with database glitches, biases and errors. Those in the know will see what properties (tokens) have not moved for a while and make a claim or pervert the digital system in ways unconscionable to other players. It is only a matter of time now.

Even with a hard copy of the title, it is a record of what was in the 'old system' and the old rules, records have moved on. Remember you are playing in their game, le-gality, not re-ality. You've paid large amounts of money, maybe a lifetime of savings, for their electronic records to reflect that you are the legal, rightful property 'Proprietor'. (Builings on the Land.)

Oxford Civil Dictionary: Proprietor, Owner of a business, or holder of property. A 'lease hold' over the land you occupy or settle on, not outright ownership; as no one, can Lawfully own the land, you may have moved land (dirt) around, You have not created any land. However you can lawfully own what you create; Dwellings built upon, under or above. Although those materials come from the land originally... enigma!

The Government has alreday shown any wealth under your land is not yours, that wealth could be pledged as collateral for any Gov. Loans or outstanding debts, if/when the Gov. fails to payback, your land could be seized and you are forced off, under Compulsory Acquisition, with little or no compensation, just a costly legal battle or the expense to move your home elsewhere or cost of demolition...

You might think your saving grace is that you occupy the site, but so did the indigenous people and early settlers of Australia. Property Rights are an illusion, when Gov. uses 'might makes right', legal or physical...

Only the objects a living person owns are those the you create, to facilitate an outcome, until confiscation, destroyed, disposed of, or discarded. e.g. Boomerang or spear to 'kill pray' for food, or 'ward off' aggressors... or House for shelter or Factory for employment and trade...

Today's Indigenous inhabitants claim 'the land', nor 'their authority' was ever surrendered or ceded, to the British empire or anyone else. Correct, it sill has not been, as no one can own or claim authority over anyone else, under 'Natural Law' of 'living Men and Women'.

It is true the claims of theft, murder and fraud; against the British Empire Occupiers, has some substance due to 'lack of facts', of evidence of how aquiring the land as property came about from indigenous and pre-1840 established settlers, of greater NSW(?).

As everything you think you own; you or someone else has registered that with the Government system, it is part of their 'virtual legal realm'. You already own nothing, they let you buy land off their 'portfolio' to build, or land bank. You ask a 'Money Bank' to loan you money to buy and build, pay an annual uncapped, ever increasing, fee to local Government, to live there and pay others to improve, maintain and supply services to that property, which increases in value, but the 'Valuer General' never visits.

The whole 'virtual system', is based on theft, of the actual lands, sold or technically it is 'lease hold' to you, means a right to be on that portfolio and title block.

'Might makes right' has and still is used, by today's authorities, which do have an obligation to explain how 'the crown' or 'the government' can lay claim to it's ongoing authority and stewardship. There is no 'statute of limitation' on theft, murder or fraud and the 'fraud' part appears to continue today by current Governments at all levels...

Is it the 'legal fictions' of Government, taking from the 'living Men and Women' and declaring them all as 'legal fictions' or as children (needing Gov. to look after them), over their reality, to claim authority 'over the people', which the people's have vested their power to Parliament (Government) by the representatives, to operate society's resources on behalf of the people, for the benefit of all the people. The fact Government has unlawfully sold off the people's investments and corporatised most Government bodies so as to play in their 'virtual legal system' to extract evermore wealth from the people...

This concept is currently perverted and skewed for the benefit of the few, and not they many. TBC

3. Artificial Law:
Except for Natural Law all other Laws are Artificial Constructs of Rules. i.e. Sports, Religions, Private Agreements, Government, or Business etc. Made up by 'People' to assist in operations, of life, games and strange imaginations. These form 'Private' or 'Public' knowable standards, on top of the Natural & Common Law Rules.

Rules all members of Society need to know or find out easily, to take on wilful roles, and ensure all others know what those rules are, which are strictly followed and monitored by others, for compliance, performance and good conduct.

To Protect and Secure because of the potential to betray, with the compete or cooperate options in play, by Private Accord with mutual understanding to share or exchange resources, achieve goals or whatever is demanding, are between the parties to workout, by Private Agreement with no doubts.

Private Law usually follows the Public 'Common Law' rules, not to cause harm or disadvantage, but as they are 'Private', only the parties involved know all the rules. 'Secret Cults' or 'Family Ties', 'Religious Orders' or 'Commercial Codes', all use 'Private Law' to ensure clear expectations, on all involved. These are usually not under Government legislative control, as they are 'Private' they can not be involved; unless the parties agree to refer disputes to outside entities, like Mediators or Private Courts.

'Common Law' are the unwritten rules of the 'lawful realm',
that Complex Organisms and 'the People' follow. These simple rules, in alignment with 'Natural Laws', and follow our ancient Birthrights, Customs and Liberties, as passed down through 'Lore' and as found sometimes codified in 'Case Law' (the Legal Realm).

In the Western Hemisphere (UK) at least since 1215, ~811 years and maybe to back to Roman (EU) times, ~2081+ years ago (Londinium) or plausibility sumerian (Middle East) times ~6526+ years ago, (cuneiform tablets, pictographs), or 'Aboriginal Lore' ~62026+ years ago, or 'Anunnaki Lore' pushing back even further in time, to mention a few of the cultures where 'Lore' has originated from.

For all creatures, 'Lore', has no written text, only physical or vocal expressions of 'right and wrong'... Humans tell verbal stories, or interpretation by 'dance', or 'vague images' on rocks, or an 'assembly of rock(s)', or natural formations. When you observe Nature, other animals do similar actions, it is 'common' to all living entities.

'Common Law', Law of the Land, is the 1st 'Legal Fiction' of simple rules, for living Men and Women of society to cooperate peacefully, equally, respectfully, lawfully in all that they do. Disregard those rules and risk being ostracised.

'Common Law' are rules, generally understood by most people of the society that follow morals, right, wrong, justice and injustice of events. The People work independently or cooperatively for reward or honour, with the environment, making resources for society that all can use, share, and consume as needed for the ongoing sustainability of Life.

As society becomes more complex, special tasks to manage such are created, as well as special skills, needed to ensure the society can function and provide for all.

Government was created to help manage the resources, when a village was to populated for all to have a say. Then slowly the thugs, as 'rulers' by force, provided protection, for 'all' of course. Then demanded tribute from each, for their protection, welfare and keeping the Peace. Tribute as Produce, or 'money of the day', or indebted service, as the better way to pay.

More Details in Simple Common Law Rules.
See File #1 ' /_law/my_law1.html '

A simple set of Rules, not always written down, as in epochs past, most could not read, but as practiced or told, or as expected in society.

Observing customs of 'right from wrong'; 'fairness and honesty' and in 'good faith with honour' in all dealings with the understanding of 'cause no harm' and to always be 'respectful of each Person and their Rights'.

As each is sovereign in their own Skin, House or Castle, as over time these rules, as set and practiced by 'the people' from their Lore, for the 'common good' of all; in protecting themselves, each other, and their homes, with proportional force, when that need is called.

Keeping the 'Peace' through mutual respect and sharing resources equitablly with all.

Western Hemisphere History...

'Law of the Land', by different tribes, communities, clands, then more people arrived...

In General 'Artificial Laws' are those imposed by force, through Physical, Coercion or Subterfuge. Should be by 'logic', 'reason' and mutual wilful 'agreement', however, 'Might Makes Right' or 'Mob Rule' has been imposed throught history, until the imposed 'Artificial Law' has no meaning, no trust, no validity or expectation to be honoured.

A 'Reset is Required', usually by another violent uprising by the People against the 'Rule of Man', to reinstate the 'Rule of Law'; the 'People's Common Law', Simple Rules everyone can know, understand, and 'live by' as adults, without the need for specialists to interpret, represent and decree outcomes.

The 4th Industrial Turning with 'Artificial Intelligence' to sort out disputes based on 'past case law', will fail to provide equitable outcomes, as 'case law', has lots of inconsistencies of outcomes. Those programming the AI with corrupt, naive, ideologies... (Garbage In ~ Garbage Out)

Some UK Key Years:
Roman(Law) 55BC - 410AD, Norman(Law) 1066AD,
Magna Carta 1215AD(Great Charter) - 1297AD(The Act),
Will & Mary 1688-89AD(Restart of the People's Parliament),
1700 Act of Settlement, a Bill of Rights, ...
Slavery Abolished 1833-38AD(Throughout the Empire),
Women allowed to Vote 1918(Limited) & 1928AD(All),
U.N.1945AD(Universal Human Rights),
Nuremberg Code 1946AD(Medical Rights),
National Health 1948AD(Health Rights)...

History is replete with achievements and failures...
Western Countries, includes Australia, inherit a lot from UK 'Customs, Legislation and Law'. Australia's version of the 'same' is problematic at best; as the way it achieves Authority. Consent of 'the People', is mostly ignored, by the 'Party Machines', and secret accords.

'The Constitution' of: 1901, built on the UK's Westminster legacy, a history replete with gains and losses. A Federation to oversee the Nation, to adjoin the colonies of their mis-appropriations, to allow each State and Territory to have, a uniform legal legislation, of rules that Politicians and Government must follow.

Through Votes, Pleblicites and Referendums, to obtain the 'People's Will' and their Authority, but sadly no. As results are observed, but at times ignored, or re-interpreted by the Political horde, for what they want, or think, 'the People meant'; or just cite 'convention' to get around the whole event.

'Government', the 2nd 'Legal Fiction', of the people to only cover 'Government, Commerce and Trade'. Nowadays perverted by the Party Machines, Corporations, (some now wealthier than most Governments) and other entities that keep a low profile and out of public view...

Government is suppose to only oversee 'Trade and Commerce' through Legislation and Regulation on behalf of the people, not over the people. Many years ago, the legal system redefined what a 'person' is and created without full disclosure, a commercial 'legal entity', a 'legal fiction', in each person's birth name. This allows Government to control everyone doing 'Trade and Commerce' and going about their business of living to survive.

The created (Government) now captures the creator (the people) but in a very sly underhanded way, which is further perverted by other institutions and all done without 'full disclosure' and by deceitful, tacit consent; in brief a fraud.

The people notionally oversee their elected representatives and Government through open transparent Government, on how their elected representatives vote on behalf of the electorate's will. If malfeasance is detected, then removal through the legal process, as layed out in constitutions and by oaths.

Over time the system has become corrupted by many exceptions of procedures... e.g. The revolving door process of 'public office' to 'private business', back to 'public office' and repeat; all to change, add or repeal Statutes, to restrain competitors, while allowing wealthy Corporations, Individuals, or Governments to have advantage over the people and anyone that opposes their rule. i.e. Mal/Mis/Dis-information decrees.

Ditty: Government was originally created by some 'People', who had a say, in an 'Ancient Societal Order', long ago and far away, to form some Rules, 'deemed Laws', for specific operations, for Society's score and manipulation. Governed back then by 'leaders' who were seen as 'Gods', which seems absurd nowadays but check my Refs: Ancient Sumerians (1st civilization?), Anunnaki (long lived off worlders) and the book of Enoch (about Human origins) and hidden, or denied from the masses for centuries to keep control of the masses and the planetary resources.

Advance an epoch or two and today's 'living Men and Women' require; 'full disclosure' of all 'legal rules'. Subject to the people's self asserted 'in-a-lien-able' Rights, of hard fought for Freedoms and Moral insights, before temporarily suspending their Will, to follow another's Will, be they living, dead or set in silicone.

For without the 'wilful' consent, it is 'slavery' with intent; Slavery abolished again in ~1833-38 under King William IV and completed by, Queen Victoria. Penalties for Slavery, and Trafficking Slaves, up to 25 Years of imprisonment, so transgress wisely, at own risk!

As the People have revolted many times before, against thoses that seek to score.

Generally the Government (Their Party Machines) are deluded. In the 1960's Legal Academics wrote papers to express 'Parliament', the people Representatives are the supreme Law maker, trying to convince the 'equal in power', Judicial Arm, that Parliament has sovereignty by virtue it makes laws. Absolute Rubbish!

Parliament makes Statutes, that are 'deemed laws', and the Judicial Arm, or a Jury of Peers, can throw those Statutes out; if the 'deemed law', breaks 'Common Law', ignores 'Natural Law' or Harms the People. The Crown, 1st of equals among the people, Judges, appointed by Parliament, and Juries, selected from the People, all keep check on Parliament, and each other.

The Crown checks, by granting Statutes ascension, if or when Statutes are challenged, the Judical review process and/or via a Jury of the People is asked to examine and test if the deemed law breaks or harms.

The People are the supreme Law makers, as they give Parliament Authority, not to rule over them, but on behalf of the people, to administer society, for the benefit of all. In a Trust Role, as elected representatives are the Trustees, some of the representatives become the executive, (Executors) and the people are the Beneficiaries.

Judges play a key role to ensure all are following the trust rules. As anyone can only occupy 2 of these 3 positions. Trustees administer, executors direct trustees and Beneficiaries receive the fruits of their labours...

The Power behind the 'system' has been slowly, over time, re-educating the elite, not educating the people, and ensuring People's representatives have 1st, loyalities to the Party, 2nd to Party Supporters and constituents a distant last.

Sanctimonious Hypocrisy Ditty:
Observation: For truth to be told, must be only from on high, if it is not from a 'poly', it is a lie! - Now invert this idea, to be more accurate, they admit they're unfit for office, 'Hows-zat!' They should be arrested and jailed as brats, for the billions embezzled, with overpayments on spats and by special legislation for their wealthy mate rats.

National & State Constitutions are irrevocable 'Legal Agreements'.
These types of 'Trust Deed' are between 'the People' and the People's Government.
Everyone is automatically a Beneficiary, occupying 1 of the 3 positions. Any Trust Deed sets out the structure of the Trust, who is who, and what each can, or is expected to do...

Government as our elected representatives, or as Public Servant employees, are Beneficiaries and also 'Trustees', or 'Executors'. Occupying the maximum 2 of the 3 positions to manage the resources and look after the needs of all the people, as in the Living Men and Women according to the rules of the Constitution(s), that Governments must follow or else be in breach of their fiduciary duties and liable for serious penalties or imprisonment.

Any Legal Trust has only three 'Positions':
Trustee, Executor, Beneficiary; Translate as:

• Trustee = Government Boffins, (Resource Managers...)
• Executor = Government Exec. (Those incharge of Gov.)
• Beneficiary = The people...(Everyone)

Over the centuries, these 3 positions can have different names, but all those names slot in to one of these 3 positions. These 3 positions come into being once a trust is created, usually by a Grantor which supplies the resources for the Trust and appoints a Trustee(s), an Executor(s), and nominates who the Beneficiaries are.

The People (Living Men and Women) as Beneficiary and joint Appointor can hold, to account, or dismiss, the 'Trustee' or 'Executor', by first inquiry, and remove by vote, or via legal process, according to the laws that govern the trust, especially if matters are not being carried out honestly and openly. Appointments in Governments are usually for a set period, i.e. 4 years, while others, like permanent secretaries, may hold office at the people's or executor's pleasure for decades.

In an 'irrevocable Trust Deed', may be amended, by all or majority of parties agreeing; meaning you must fully inform all, and achieve the approval of all, or as specified as numbers of, or percentage of, the Beneficiaries in the Trust Deed, else nothing can be changed.

A 'revocable Trust Deed' can be amended, but only by the Deed's Creator (if still alive), at any time. National and State Constitutions are 'irrevocable', as they are created by or for, and then voted on, or by the people (Living Men and Women) as Beneficiaries and Appointors.

Some irrevocable 'Trust Deeds' may have clauses to allow some parts of the deed to be amendable, revocable, but only as specified in the conditions under the auspice of the issuing authority of the trust: i.e. the People as Grantor = Settlor = Trustor, and Appointor = Guardian or Principle, to whom has the ultimate control of the trust and appoints trustees and executors as manager(s) of the trust's resources, which are provided by the trust's creator, 'The people', from their ongoing creation of society.

A Beneficiary is the inheritor, receiver of the outcomes of any Trust, as specified in the Deed's Rules. The Beneficiary does not need to be aware of those rules, but should be, to ensure correct operations are occuring as stated in those rules, fulfilled by two willing parties, the Trustee and the Executor. The number of 'Living Men or Women', fulfilling two of the 3 roles, have no limits on numbers in each of those roles.

As all are Beneficiaries (in the millions) their 2nd position (if one) can have thousands in as Trustee or as Executors, caution must be observed, as when a Beneficary is also a Trustee, the seperation 'at arms length' of duties and outcomes must be observed, else, the Trust may become null and void, as once there is a conflict of self serving results, the trust can functionally collapse and become invalid.

Remember All parties of a Trust are 'legal fictions', each Beneficary has a Government Created Token for them, that reflects their Birth Name, Date of Birth and some unique identifier (number) to allocate their share of the People's Commonwealth.

The Executors (Government Executive) carries out the 'wishes' or 'Will' of the 'Deed Maker', (the People) as specified in the Constitution, and through the people's representatives (Trustees/Executors), when directed by the people, allocate or reallocate resources. Once the 'Executor' has completed their task, and handed resources to the 'Trustee' to manage, the Executor position is effectively vaccant, until needed to allocate resources or perform executive functions.

A Beneficary may also become Executor but only to direct their entity's entitlements as the Beneficary Wills. Government known to trick (misguide) the Beneficary into the role of Trustee, to pay or surrender the Beneficary's entitlements, or personal resouces to Government coffers.

The Trustee (Government Boffins) hold and manages the property (Country's resources) for the 'enjoyment' of all Beneficiaries (the People) to assist their respective lives as needed. (Sadly all involved fail this part.)

As the Beneficiaries (the people) are not fully informed what Government is really there for, mischief by trustees or executors can occur. Misunderstanding by all parties involved on who is what and whom are Beneficiaries.

As Beneficiaries do not need to sign on to a trust they are mentioned in, and play no role in the administration, they may be unaware they are entitled to benefits from the trust.

Some may unknowingly but willingly take up, one of the other two roles. As employees of the Government, or if required to, declare by 'special appearance', they are an 'Executor and Beneficiary' to direct the Trustee (Government directly via a Court) where or how any specific benefits or specific tasks, related to their specific share are to be used or carried out. (e.g. Approve, allocated 'trust' finances, to go towards payment of incurred: Bills, Fines, or Projects...)

The People are the 'Power and Source of Authority' for Parliament, as Parliament is the creation, the 'legal fiction', of the people, to help manage society for the benefit of all, at least since 1688, with many bloody battles and murders to decide, by force who is really the power behind any Parliament, the Crown, the Representatives, or the People...

Today it is the oligarchy of Big Business, and Billionaires with their stooges, and useful idiot sycophants.

The People always stand above their creation, not in, or under it, or as a dam-nation to be governed over. As obligations go, all must be 'fully informed' and 'wilfully' accept, any 'roles on offer', that benefit all.

Parliament's Authority and Power can only ever come from, 'the People' as they outlast all tyrants, dictators, thugs. Today it is the Legal system, encouraged by 'Political Parties', to obscure these authoritive levels of Law, to hide the truth of where power of Parliament resides.

The mis-belief by Parliamentarians that 'Parliament is Supreme', Law maker or Authority, can not be true, according to the safeguards under the 'Separation of Powers', as 'Representatives', 'Executives' and 'Judicial' are equal and no one branch has absolute authority.

The People are the Supreme Law makers, as only through their Representatives can Parliament truely make Laws. Bad Laws get Representatives kicked out of office or sued or worse killed. Which is currently perverted by the 'Party System' blocking the 'People's Will' and any removal of bad representatives.
See section below Separation of Powers.

Under any contract, you must be 'fully informed', and give 'wilful consent', to the 'terms and conditions'. As there are no contracts for each person, how can 'the people' be subject to the 'small number' of their elected Representatives, to Rule over them?

It is absurd, perpetrated by the Party Machines (Bosses, Donors, Vested Interests) to deceive 'the People', unlawfully, control their Representatives, and so far wield unaccountable power, over the nation, and it's resources. This has been going on for many decades because of 'boffin mischief' and 'lack of education' to the people. It is overdue to be corrected, events in the 2020's clearly showed the 'boffins' do not understand their roles. That representatives first loyality is to a party machine, party backers and constituents a distance last.

Since before 1688, a Parliament is a 'Legal Place' of elected or appointed People, occupying positions of 'legal fiction', following agreed 'verbal or written set of rules' to 'Assist Society' (the Monarch or Rulers) manage resources for the benefit of all. History is replete with the opposite occurring and many ending in bloody murderous results.

Since 1688 Parliament Legislation is not to cause 'Harm or Prejudice the People' and can only make 'Statutes' (Legislation) which is deemed Law after Royal Assent by the Crowne. Law that relates to 'peace, order and good Government' for 'the People' and those that choose to stand under Parliamentary Authority. As each employee is under contract with 'full dislosure' and by 'Wilful consent' to stated obligations, terms and conditions to obey.

Laws for 'Trade and Commerce' are regulated by Parliament on behalf of 'the People', require entities to sign on to that Authority as agreements or registrations as Companies, Corporations, Charities or Trusts. Government Departments over time also became Corporations, for several reasons, to facilitate services for the benefit of the People, limit liability, privatise where that is best practice, or to split up an authority when its size or area of operations is too big for a single entity to manage.

However since ~1850 maybe earlier a slow shift to remove 'the People' as the authority and privatise profitable Government entities, in to money making instruments, for the elites and again attempt to enslave, control and corrupt the due processes of equity. Doomed to fail, it has been tried many times before, works for a while, then blows up, each time with murderous bloody outcomes and a reset of some kind...

Governments nowadays are Businesses, as the US Supreme Court found over a 'fiscal claim', drawn out for years, to sheet home blame over a fraudulent cheque. The end result was 'Corporatized Government Departments' loose their Government indemity and become legally the same. As any other 'Corporate Company' or Business... Read the long version (1936-1943) Ref: [1943: Clearfield Trust Co. v. United States, 318 U.S. 363-371] aka 'Clearfield Doctrine'.

Note: In the Australian Commonwealth 1901 Constitution Act and respective State or Territory Governments with their own Constitutionary Acts, all employees that sign and make an 'Oath' to Authority or the Crown, or to both, are all linked fiscally together; by Australian federal promissory notes (money) and are not separate Sovereign entities that some of the boffins think they are. All State and Territory Government bodies are subject to the Federal Constitution, highest body of LAW.

As the collective Power and Authority for Parliament is 'the people' and they do not, sign or make an oath, as they are not employed by the State, for they are 'the Power' of the State.

As 'Living Men and Women' working society for the benefit of all, they are Sovereign, Independant and Beneficiary of their own labours and of the 'State's Institutions', operated in the name of 'the People', for the benefit of 'all the People'.

See Federal or any Constitution, the pre-ambles are very important as they explain clearly, in brief, who has assembled, under whom, and the type of assembly. State Constitutions are based on being seperate Colonies of the Imperial Parliament of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland... (British Empire) 1788 - 1900 and therefore Subjects are under the protections of the UK Parliament and its many acts, Statues and agreements, since at least 1688, but as noted in the State (Vic.) Constitution 1855 & 1975 all laws and stautes in force within the realm of England, on and after 25 July 1828.

The Preamble of the 1855 Vic.Constitution was for better Government of Her Majesty's Australian Colonies. There is no specific mention of the People of the Colony, as they were already considered covered as Subjects of the Monarch?

Consider: What is the point of any Government, who does it serve, it must serve all the people, not just the elites, knobility, or Monach. If it is not serving all the people, then it is slavery? Queen Victoria outlawed Slavery in 1834-36 British Empire-wide.

If it only serves a select few or itself, it has become an abomination and must be dissolved and reconstituted with people that understand the true role of Government. As was done in 1688-89, in the UK 'Glorious Revolution' to out corruption, ineptitude, punish and claw back any and all ill-gotten gains and remedy those wronged, by the wrongdoers.

The Crown's oath since 1688 claims to be 'the People's Protector'; from any abhorrent Parliament Legislation (Paraphrased). As the 1st of equals, the People's Protector, checks that no harmfull legislation will Assent.

Crown nowadays ignores such obligation, see UK Coronation Oath Act 1688 for that binding rule. The UK Monarch is also Australia's Monarch, represented by the Governor General, or the Governor of each Australian State. Parliaments claim, these Monarch's Representatives must rubber stamp (assent) whatever Parliament wants, which is incorrect by their Oaths...

Since 1975 (the dismissal) Governer Generals and State Governers have chosen not to exercise that power, as the Government of the day appoints these people to such positions with a wink and a nod. Prior to 1975 the Appointments were vetted by the Crown, to protect the Crown's interest, not the People's.

• Followed Legislative 'due process'?
• Was it heard and debated
  in both houses of Parliament?
• Received Royal Assent?
• Valid Proclamation Certificate? and
• Posted in the Government Gazette?

The legal boffins presenting or defending, must gather all evidence to support their respective cases and should not assume established statutes have under gone due process correctly. As many are lazy or mislayed information leading to miscarriages of justice or anullment of statutes. (i.e ATO not a legal entity?)

Once verified, is the 'Statute' a 'new Law' or does it fit in to existing Legal 'Case Law' and aligns with Lawful 'Common Law'. If not, or is 'incompatible' or 'due process' has not been followed, then the 'Statute(s)' should be 'nullified' (not enforcable law) and sent back to Parliament to fix or abandon.

As the Courts, according to their respective constitutions, can not make Legislation, only interpret existing Legislation, so as to comply with Legal 'Case Law' and Lawful 'Common Law'. The Judiciary is equal in power to the executive Government, not in anyway can it be subservant. See Seperation of Powers Doctrine.

The arguing parties ability or inability to present persuasive reason(s) and facts to the court is critical to help Judge(s) and Juries render correct verdics.

The argument, that as 'Judges are not elected' they must uphold or pass Parliament Laws regardless, is false, as the Separation of Powers allows Judicial 'nullification' as the Courts are required to dispense 'equitable' justice for all. This is suppose to be another path to curtail unjust or bad Laws, that slipped pass the Crown.

At each Level of Government; Federal, State and Territory is suppose to follow the 'Westminster System' of Government. Each are broken into 3 'equally powerful' arms or branches as: 'Representatives', 'Executive' and 'Judicial' to ensure, no Branch, no Parliament has absolute power.

In Australia, Local Government is a Department of the State, and follows a controversial hybrid or cut-down version of the 'Westminster System'. As the Judicial part remains with the State or Federal. However Local Government likes to pass 'by-laws' and 'set fines', under secondary legislation, as Regulation, in confict with Federal and sometimes State Constitutions; as does the State, in conflict with the Federal Constitution.

When inconsistency occur, only the part that is inconsistant, is overriden by the 'Federal Constitution' or 'nullified' and may still be enforced in part or whole; it all depends on how 'logical' and 'reasonable' your arguements are.

Briefly: Parliaments can not be a Court, a Judge, Gaol or Fine anyone. That is the solemn function of the Judicial arm, as part of 'due process' and equitable justice for all. Courts can not write Statutes, only interpret those already written, to align with 'common and case law'.

Representatives are from the people, Executive from the Representatives, Judges from the Legal Profession appointed by the Executive and any / all of the above are individually removable by Parliament, if wrongdoing is upheld by a Court. Representatives serve a fixed time, as appointed by their constituents.

The People talk to Parliament through Representatives, which today are nobbled by their respective Political Parties, to only address Party Policies, 'fob-off' constituents with other concerns. Representatives that do follow up constituents other concerns, run the risk of their Party's Disendorsment or Expulsion from their Party and candicacy at the next election. Party Machines have more resources than independants and this clearly shows 'Political Parties' do pervert the 'Will of the People'; Q.E.D.

In brief, they should be ignored, as they do not follow their contracts, oaths or laws. They do extract 'hefty tolls' from the people and admit to using coercion, threats and violence to make 'the people' comply to 'Parliamentary Will'. Parties are funded by Vested Interests and rewarded that funding with lucrative Government contracts or special grants...

Coercion: e.g. robo-debt, mandated jabs, lock downs, these examples also show these Ministers (Representatives) should have also been prosecuted for 'manslaughter', 'malfeasance in office' and lost all gains made while in office, with proceeds distributed to the victims, to remedy harm done. Saddly the system, their Party Machines, protects them and each other, effectively these Party Machines have placed Parliamentarians above the LAW. May need a 'Class Action' by the people, as no other arm of Government would last long enough to complete the justice cycle.

Tricks that the 3 levels of Government (Federal, State, and Local) like to play, is to force their interpretation of the Law (Statutes) not the Courts. Usually through coercion, as threats of legal processs, and like a 'Mafia' to avoid trouble, pay our 'fines', reduced price, if paid by date. Clearly run like a scam, but defending at court may be more expensive and time consuming than paying the fine. Which is what their thiefdoms rely on.

The threat or execution of confiscation (of assets or Garnishee of bank account), denial of services, or imprisonment (suppose to be only for criminal acts, not civil), is to punish those who stand up against their unlawful 'demands of money with menace' and deny due process of Law...

Their system relies on it being cheaper and less time consuming to pay up, shut up, than to defend your Rights. As only a few do challenge and occasionally do win. but for most others, it is to knuckle under and submit. Knowing it is wrong or harmful, and under 'Common Law' could seek 'remedy' but can not afford the time or cost to pursue, as you have bills to pay, family to keep, tasks that must be accomplished, to aquire currency, to pay the fines, to break their rules, to rinse and repeat.

The people appoint from each electorate Representatives to raise concerns of 'the people' about the business of government, laws of the realm, perceived and actual grievances on society etc. Parliament has two houses:

1. House of Representatives, the Lower House: To raise, debate, and express the concerns of the people. Propose New, amend or repeal Legislation...


2. House of Review, The Senate, the Upper House: to ensure the 'house of Representatives' Bills, Legislation does not 'cause harm', or 'Prejudices anyone', of their State or the Nation, with 'fresh eyes' on all proposed legislation to debate and ensure integrity of propriety and edify as expressed in the 'House of Review' for the 'House of Reps' to consider and pass the edifications.

Any Legislation rushed through, received 'Royal As-sent', should be challenged in the 'High Court', as it has failed to follow 'due process', and has perverted the 'Will of the People'. Laws that have not followed 'due process', could be considered 'null and void', and unenforcable, but the expense of time and money for Individuals to challenge is prohibitive, which is what the 'Party Machines' rely upon.

Parliament Legislation is replete with 'vested interests' being served at the expense of 'the People' and Political Parties, and their members being rewarded later with donations or jobs after politics; the corruption is obvious, they are not concerned, Parliament is not being run as Oathed.

When Government, the Crown or 'a department' is 'corporatised' or 'outsources it's functions' to a separate Business or Corporation; they loose the 'Crown & Government' indemnity and drop to the lower law level, like any other registered Business, Corporation, Trust, or Charity etc. with Government Authority.

Because all trade is done in 'federally issued currency', 'federal laws' must apply, any State laws are Constitutionally barred from issuing currency, except for Gold and Silver coins of appropriate denomination. Ref: Australia 1901 Constitution Act Sect(51(xii)) & Sect(115) see also: USA 'Clearfield Doctrine' SC P.318 U.S.363(1943) where the US Supreme Court treats federal departments (treasury) like any other company; case was trying to recover monies.

All these 'legal fictions' are operated by 'living Men and Women', that change rolls, and positions. There must be records and 'Rules' that spelled out, to understand, who done what roles and figure-out, obligations there are to do, and who did it last to be consistant and true. As without written records, how can anyone plan, or know what has happened. Each entity needs to comply with their obligations as agreed by Willing participants of all involved 'fictions'.
For more examples see Abusers of Contracts below.

Business, Corporation or Government Agreements; Any Entity or Object Registered, Licenced or Covered by Legislation with 'full disclosure' and 'wilful consent' by all parties, are deemed to have agreed to stand under Parliament's Authority and abide by the associated Legislation, Regulation, Case Law and Common Law. That is a lot of rules to know, understand and obey, let alone to agree to. Few, if any, would be able to comply.

Full Disclosure & Wilful Consent is not always done, as such any contract can be 'null and void'. To long did not read (TLDR), to complex did not understand (TCDU). Especially when forced to accept new 'Terms & Conditions' to keep the thing or to continue to use the service. Equally Obligations to pay without any ability to negotiate, or have a 'meeting of the minds' to clarify terms or if there is any omission of facts (fraud), at anytime during a contract, could be considered unconscionable, rendered 'null and void' and becomes unenforceable. That fine print is very important, it is where the legal trickery starts and deceptions, obligations, exemptions can be hidden...

Are usually Big Organisations and Government Departments, which collude to work against 'the People'. These are 'Legal Fictions' operated by 'Living Men & Women', dealing with other 'Legal Fictions' or 'Living Men & Women' for commerce.

Commerce always requires a 'contract', preferably as uneditable hardcopy or uneditable electronic text, and not verbal. Contracts like 'Statutes', outlining all 'terms and conditions' to consider and to eventually obtain 'wilful consent' from a 'meeting of the minds', in real time or more than likely in delayed time. Delayed as: here is the document, read it, like it, sign it, otherwise stop, go away; No negotiation or clarification on 'terms' or what 'dictionary type' is being used (Plain or Legal). An unconscionable contract is 'non-rebuttal' of offer, or 'silence' is acceptance...

Abuse 1: By Lobbyist writing legislation and Politicians pushing those bad and harmful Statute laws and guillotining any debate through Parliaments, ignoring or perverting legislative 'due process'. The possibility of 'nullifying these Statutes' rushed through, can be challenged later in a Court. Takes years via Legal or months via Political process, especially when Politicians realise it will affect them.

Abuse 2: As Big Organisations & Governments tend to set 'terms and conditions' in their favour, with the only option to accept or stop using the thing or service. 'Lawfare' best describes this situation, as whom ever has the deeper pockets, can enforce the 'Terms & Conditions', or bankrupt the other party or parties through a drawn out legal process, trying to defend or claim, under the 'Terms and Conditions'.

What Legislation 'takes away' ... 'Common Law will Restore'. This implies 'Common Law' has greater weight than 'statute Law', Courts tend to 'err' towards 'Case Law', but tend to feel 'Statute Law' is greater than 'Common Law', very interesting...

'Juries' - Ethics and Oaths. 'Trial by Jury' is different from a 'Jury Trial' both are very important, as it is everyone's right, in the 1901 Constitution to a 'Trial by Jury'. Which is a 'Jury of your peers', the difference between to two types 'Trial by Jury' and a 'Jury Trial' has morphed into existance and the legal system states there is no real difference, but practice or observance demonstrates otherwise.

'Peers' are people of equal stature, equivalent intelligence and ranknig in society or the community you come from. However in today's diverse society that is a two edge sword, as the quality of Jurors and the general stature or understanding of other people's work and their life styles, is hard to fathom for people of different cultures.

The pool of Jurors are taken 'randomly' from a electoral roles or similar list, the court offers a dozen or so, that both sides can accept, or challenge individually, based on the brief profile of the juror, their apperance, stature or if asked a question, ability to comprehend.

All depends upon the case to be examined. Most Jurors do not want to be there, they are scared of the process, their lives are put on hold and are also financially negatively impacted. Most get in, kind of listen, reach a verdic and get out asap.

Empanelled Jurors take an oath, and must speak up, as soon as they realise they have had any dealings with the accused. So to stop perception of, or actual, Jury tampering which can lead to a costly mis-trial, failing to speak up may also bring charges against the Juror.

Holding the Jury's attention on most legal matters is fraught, so theatre must be used, and to keep it simple to win, or complex to lose. As 'Trial by Jury' verdics can not be questioned or have to be explained, the verdict can sometimes be incomprehensible for others that were also present, to understand the Juries decision. There is no clear answer but because people today are nolonger of one culture, one reglion, or have similar life style ethics, it can explain much. It maybe slightly better than rolling dice, but you do get to put your case to non-lawyer types...

Yes, the system is broken and considered corrupted at multiple levels. Professionals continue to strive on, until better times...

Fracturing Legal Law: Note: { In 1979 W.A. quietly granted a system of Aboriginal Courts, fracturing the Australian legal system; other Australian States have since quietly implimented their versions with an apartheid style justice system, in breech of international law, United Nations (UN) conventions and the International Criminal Court (ICC) rulings, 'apartheid is a crime against humanity'. Australia is a signatory to UN conventions but the 'government of the day' ignores such, when it suits... Rule of who's law, anyone's? }