Questions to Consider
Questions to ConsiderUnderstand the Order of Law... | ||
| Who Serves Whom? ... work in progress ...
Toggle Dark Mode
|
||
| ||
1. Consider: Legally 'The People', Natural Persons, Individuals, the Living Souls, do not sign any agreement
or make any pledge to any Parliament or the Crown. They are not advised, if they are under any obligation,
or contract, or what the Terms and Conditions are, if such a contract exists, or what is expected of each party involved.
How can that be?
The People are 'Natural People' going about their 'Lawful Lives', consuming, maybe earning a living, living off their land, part of a family or retired. The Government, (Political Parties) which draws its' Authority from the people, now enslaves the People, the authorisers, by coercion and misleading information on whom has authority and who serves whom. Over decades this relationship has been turned around and the People kept in the dark, taken advantage of and exploited...
The common folk have little interest in Government and less in Politics, until it affects their daily lives. Then a few teach themselves, what is what, and discover there is a set of rules written in english but the same words can also mean different things in legalese. To decipher, it is important to know what Dictionaries are used, if not stated plain english. Then the daunting task of where to start is: 'The Constitution' an over-archaring set of rules that govern the Goverment(s).
Constitutional Agreements:
Are Legal Documents of the Legal Realm.
e.g. the 1901 Australian Constitution Act, and other State and Territory Constitutions,
outline how Government is to be set up, operated and limitations placed on all that signed-on to be parties involved.
Politicians (the People's Representatives), Judges (Lawyers), and Bureaucrats (admin boffins) are all employees of the People, either directly under the Crown, guided by and subject to, the Constitution; or under contract to the Crown via Government or another 'Legal Entity', as a Corporation performing an equivalent function but with lower 'Legal' standing in 'Law', than the Crown.
The Crown is the '1st of equals', amongst the People, to call the People's Representatives together at Parliament, to oversee operations and after checking any statues to be inacted are valid, grants Royal Assent and then is publically gazetted, so all operatives under Parliament know of the new information. The gazette does not go to everyone only to those that subscribe...
As a Government Corporation has no more or less, power or authority, than any other Corporation; be it Private or Public, all operatives must have contracts that show a 'meeting of the minds' occurred, to determine terms & conditions, which fully disclose and that all involved, understand what each participant's obligations and liabilities are, in their respective contracts. Be they employee, employer, customer, client, or subcontractor etc. as without terms & conditions, who does what, when, where?
But the People have no clear contract, but are coerced in handing over a percentage of their earnings or must pay fees, fines, taxes and other impositions without full disclosure, wilful consent or a 'meeting of the minds' to discover options.
The Authority for Government Constitutions always comes from 'the people'; as it is 'the people', through their Representatives, that help manage the resources and operations of the jurisdiction (Nation / State / Territory) for the benefit of all, without causing harm, loss or distress to anyone, in line with 'Natural Law', referred to as Lawful 'Common Law' and in line with the People's Lore, of Birthrights, Customs and Practices.
The only people that get to know these Legal Constitutions in details, are those that work on, or under, or in Parliament. The People are not asked to sign on, nor agree to, nor pledge an Oath, to these Constitutions, a style of 'Trust Deed'; a document that willingly binds those that sign-on, 'as Trustees' or 'Executors' to undertake the fiduciary obligations on behalf of the 'beneficiaries', which is always the people.
There is no limit on the number of 'Trustees', 'Executors' or 'Beneficiaries', in a Trust, but there must always be someone in each, and no one can occupy more than two positions at any one time.
Parliaments, like to quote we are all bound by Parliament's Laws. How? By 'we', if they mean those working in, or for Parliament, then that would be a valid statement.
As Government is supposedly working on behalf of all, in an irrevocable trust, known as a the Constitutional. Rules under the 'Lawful Realm of Common Law' and then guided by their 'Legal Realm', and under any additional 'Parliamentary' rules of statutes, regulations, by-laws, etc. Which help protect the functions of those rules and all that sign-on to those rules.
Those rules are all 'deemed as Laws' in the 'Legal Realm' until challenged in a 'Legal Court', to determine validity and alignment to the Constitutions (Trust Deed) and the Lawful Realm of 'Common Laws'.
Hence why situations can arise when 'Legal' is not 'Lawful', as signatories that have suspended their 'Lawful Rights' to under take their 'Legal Duties', but the 'Legal Duties' may be found inconsistent, incompatible, invalid and maybe void.
If a 'Legal Court' is compromised by their 'Legal Duties', then a 'Lawful Court' of, and from, the people should be called.
This is why a 'Trial by Jury' (not a Jury Trial) is always an option, for any accused wrongdoer, to allow the 'Common People', those that authorise Government, to hear the accusations, the evidence and the reasoning for the prosecution, then find a verdict.
-
Any Trust has only three 'Legal Fictional' parts:
- Trustee = Government Boffins (employees).
- Executor = Government executives (employees) from the people's representatives of the day.
- Beneficiary = The people. The People can dismiss or hold to account, the Trustee, or Executor, by inquiry, be remove by vote, or legal process, according to the laws that govern trusts (Constitution).
Trustee, Executor, Beneficiary; Translate as:
A 'Trust Deed' may be amended by all parties agreeing; meaning you must fully inform all, and achieve the approval of all, or a majority percenatge, as specified in the Trust Deed, else nothing can change.
A Beneficiary is the inheritor, receiver of the outcomes of any Trust, as specified in the Deed's Rules. The Beneficiary does not need to be aware of those rules, but should be informed, to ensure correct operations are occuring, as stated in those rules; fulfilled by the other two willing parties, undertaking the fiduciary duties of 'Trustee' and 'Executor'.
The Executor (Government Executive) carries out the wishes or 'Will' of the 'deed maker' (the People, via their Representatives), as specified in the Trust Deed, 'the Constitution', and as revised by 'the people' through referendums.
The Trustee (Government Boffins) holds and manages the property (Country's resources) for the 'enjoyment' of all Beneficiaries (the People) to assist their respective lives as needed or as specified in the Deed's rules.
As the Beneficiaries (the people) are not fully informed, nor need to individually sign-on to a trust, by impossibility of managing the numbers; (births, deaths, departures, arrivals etc.) Government being the smaller managable number, must sign-on willingly to suspend their Rights and effectively be 'Trustees' and 'Executors'; to be accountable and to assist 'the People' manage the People's resources for everyone's benefit.
Beneficiaries play no role in administration, unless they willingly take up, one of the other two roles; as employees of the people's Government, or through 'freedom of information' audit the Government. As Government is suppose to always be transparent, so any wrongdoing can be known and corrected.
As any one party in a Trust, can only occupy up to two of the three positions. Signing on means they accept the role as Trustee and still be a Beneficiary or Signon as Executor and still be a Beneficiary, but if Trustee and Executor, must suspend their role as Beneficiary, to Look after the interests of all the other beneficaries.
When they retire, resign, etc. they can then enjoy the fruits of their efforts,
as someone else now takes on their role of Trustee, and Executor...
Sadly corruption, greed, stupidy, perverts this simple operation and disclosure of obligations of the
trustees and executors, to the beneficaries....
I suggest the 'political class' and maybe the 'legal class' are under a delusion, or mis-comprehension, that 'all people' are subject to the 'Federal' and 'State' and 'Terrority' Constitutions, as part of a 'trust', they are, however as beneficaries, with the only obligation to keep a check of the other two parties.
Many maybe aware of, but do not understand all the clauses and interactions of constitutions, statutes, by-laws, and regulations. These are there to ensure all are playing fairly, when engaged in 'Commerce and Trade', living a life is not under these rules. The sheer amount of 'rules' in play, I doubt any of society's classes would understand how it is all suppose to work. Today it is very hap-hazard.
A read of the overarching '1901 Constitution'; it states many things that 'subjugate' the boffins of Government to specific rules of law. The openning statement clearly suggests, Government draws it's Authority 'from the People'. As it is the people of the 'colonies of Australia' through their representatives, that have drawn up the document, a type of 'trust deed', a 'rule book', on who, how and when affairs of state are to be assigned, carried out and to guide Government boffins, who, when and how this 'trust deed' constitution can be amended.
State Constitutions, since 1901 are now subject to the Rules of the 'Federal constitution', which also has similar clause that 'the people' are the authority and have a say, when their State 'trust deed' constitution can be amended.
Sadly the Government boffins have over stepped their authority many times and the people have not been fully aware and can say NO or challenge those amendments (e.g. Vic.Parliament 1989: Local Gov. Act, sect 74a was created without the People's consent. Parliament decreed that the people's Representatives can amended and add clauses without seeking approval from the people. Very WRONG!)
In fact at several referendums 'the people' have voted 'NO' and the Government Boffins effected changes by another dubious anyway. Later through the ballot, at election time, that offending Political Party was voted out, but new Party kept the changes. Legal challenges, which are complex, can be expensive and is time consuming to put together, can and have been done in the past. The Government of the day weaponizes the legal process to frustrate, delay, or bankrupt challenges, to keep their Political ideology and using a re-election the next ballot, as approval of their poor policy has been accepted. Which is sheer bunkum!
The boffins claim that to obtain millions of contractual agreements from each person of voting age is unwieldy and problematic, as all parties must be educated enough to understand the obligations, if any actually exist. Yet such is done, when the same people request 'benefits', 'lodge tax returns', 'register businesses', or take out 'loans' etc. and it just more convienient (for Government) that everybody is subject to all Government rules, by-laws, regulations, no mater how inconsistent the many rules etc. are or poorly interact, negate, or complicate the person's compliance. More Bunkum!
It is hard to believe the original approvers (the people, 1776, 1850, 1901, etc.) and drafters (representatives) of the interacting 'Federal and State and Terrority' constitutions would expect everyone to understand, all clauses, and to become willingly captured by those clauses, and to serve the boffins of Government. We know all it is the opposite, Government is to serve 'the People' and not interfer with the people's lives or cause harm to their way of life. Yet they do everyday for Government and Big Business gains.
A serious miscarriage of Governance has been occuring for way to long, by the Political Parties on the People and this MUST stop!
Question:: How has the People, the 'Authority Givers to Parliament', become obliged or liable to those that they Authorised? Without a contract to cite Terms & Conditions, a 'meeting of the minds' to ask questions or settle terms, to obtain ongoing 'full disclosure' and their 'wilful consent', how are the people to know?
Consider: Elected Representatives receive 'concerns and requests' (petitions) from the people for Parliament to address. Yet, these are ignored or fobbed off, as inconsequencial matters, or insufficient numbers (<100,000) to warrant debate.
While Political Parties push 'their designs on society' or 'impliment vested interests' designs, with little public agreement or awareness. Citing Party Policy at election time, grants them a mandate from the People, with little details (failure of full disclosure) for proper consideration on how things will impact, commerce, environment, or society.
Consider: Government Officials, supposedly on 'behalf of the People', have sign on to follow 'unelected external authorities', like the 'Paris Agreement on Climate Change, Net-Zero', or the W.H.O pandemic proceedures, or Central Banks / WEF unique Digital IDs for everyone all across the Globe. (e.g. B&MG, WEF - You will eat zee bugs! no red meat for you!
Without proper public agreement or 'full disclosure' of such to the public, all are in breech of Constitutional expectations by the People. Representatives appears to be in breech of: Federal 1901 Constitution, Section 44(i) under influence or obligation to Foreign Powers. Party Politics recently use this clause to out opposition members; to apply if you are a subject of, or entitled to be a subject of, another country. My reading of 44(i): I would also apply to any foreign organisation that your are a member or associated with, that has 'world domination' goals or are a global international organisation or business, that has undue influence on Governments and their officials.
Question:: By what means can Representatives be held accountable to their constituents? (only at election times? that's nuts!) The People usually vote Government out for their 'bad policies', 'behavior', or 'harms caused'; (Robo-debt, Net-Zero, Power Failures)
Rearly to the People vote in a Party on their Policies, which the Party(ies) with the most votes, claim mandates for all their Policies.
As most Representatives belong to a Political Party, what is their priority between Party, Donors (vested interests), Constituents? According to constitutions, Constituents are 1st and only, political parties are not mentioned, nor are financial donors and foreign powers are expressly denied any say in Government...
Question:: Have Parliaments, Representatives and Servants to the people, broken their contracts with the People? See sect. 44(i) of the 1901 Constitution Act, what is your understanding of those clauses... Ask your Representatives, see how or if they will answer...
There are many Constitutions, Laws, Regulations and Agreements, all are complex and no one person can fathom out how they all interact, let alone could be agree to, to abide by. So how does any Government employee, or Politician understand all, of what they have sign on for? (They probably don't know, but the pay and conditions are good.)
Consider: Reading the Federal Constitution, it lays out the rules for those whom undertake roles and for whom they serve. The People are not required to sign or told of any obligations, other than Parliament can make Laws. (Legislation)
Question:: What limits any Parliament from bankrupting a Nation or State?
Can the representatives, their Party, external advisors or consultants, be held liable for their poor advice / actions, losses?
Question:: Why are the people liable to pay for their mal-administration of the Nation, and those whom knowingly take advantage? Public Private Partnerships, are a great vehicle to launder money, privatise the gains, socialize the losses, keep it all commercially sensitive, so the people and Auditors can not find out. There are laws on the books about these things.
Note: Common Law decrees 'Cause no harm', always be in 'honour', 'truthful' and 'respectful' in all dealings. I have clearly noticed the opposite and so have many others, our system of Government is clearly not working as stated...
Question:: When did the People, the 'Authority Givers to Parliament' become Slaves?
Who are they enslaved to?
Slavery was abolished 1834-1838 across the empire, enforced by Military might and Law Courts across the Globe.
Investigate: When you dig into how Western Governments have slowly re-structured themselves over the decades since (circa 1776) maybe earlier; into 'Corporations' with some Government official(s) kept as head of that entity, you may ask why.
Governments and Corporations are 'dead entities', 'legal fictions', which can only be operated by the living; and the living, must identify who they are, at each time of operation, especially when corresponding to anyone, or do anything; as 'legal fictions' are dead, and can not do anything by themselves. Without knowing who is really speaking or acting, the operation could be fraudulent, 'null and void', illegal and certainly unlawful.
Conjecture: For legal reasons, as a way of skirting around some obligation, or responsibility, if / when something catches up to them. The 'legal fiction' can be woundup, sold off, declared bankrupt; while big business or a Government Department is a bit harder to do that to, it can still happens...
When a Government Department uses a Corporation as its front desk or front end; it is also suppose to follow the commercial rules, of contracts and law, to be clear, if it is a 'for profit' or a 'public benefit' entity. Being a quasi Government, the semi-private entity can be deceptive and confusing; especially when it was a 'public benefit' entity and quietly over time, now operates as a 'for profit'. (Think CBA...)
Quiet a number of Government entities have not declared or do not know themselves, if they are a 'for profit' entity; e.g. vehicle registration, land registery, local councils, law enforcement, the list of Government entities is very long. The Political Class has pulled a deception on the People they are suppose to serve, and the People have not yet fully twigged, they have been and still are being taken advantage of.
As 'for profit' should mean 'by competition', between similar entities, serving or supplying the same. Government entities all operate as monopolies as they are supposedly for public benefit. However over time these monopolies become 'cash cows', sold off for highest price (think telstra) or deliberatly run down (think Post office Parcels) for the lowest price that a Private entity can exploit. Nowadays PPPs are the rage, losses to Public, profits to Private partnerships.
Collecting money 'for profit', when it is a monopoly, is illegal by statutes, since 1624, Restrictive Practices Act 1948 and other acts as amended, repeled and re-introduced overtime, when pressure is brought to bear on the political class.
To add insult to injury, to send that profit off shore (to a tax haven), with none or a small slice as a 'diviend' back to the Government. You'll probably find the Political Class also has shares in that off shore venture, 'Public Private Partnership', held in a blind trust; is still insider trading, and being a PPP can not be pubically examined for commercial sensitive reasons; it is pure corruption!
Since the Roman empire or maybe before, Legal Fictions, are used to limit liability or to continue, after the original living person(s) died, as others wished to carry on under that established entity's name, be it Government or Private. If or when something goes wrong, sell, fold, or bankrupt the entity.
Governments are not suppose to be businesses, as they have an unfair advantage, although such is needed when starting up a new public service or balancing true competition, when the market place no longer functions, or has become a restrictive or a captured market place by only a few private players.
Where by the Government steps in, nationalizes, consolidates, then breaks up the entity again to Privatise later and restart competition. Private Public Partnerships (PPP) are restrictive, secretive and dangerous. Public Private Competition (PPC) is more robust and fairer for all.
Reject the Political Class Claims:
Parliaments are there to serve, but for decades, they believe, they are to 'rule' over 'the People' and every so often have to allow 'the People' a 'vote' to change or mix the teams around, 'Red', 'Blue', 'Green' etc.
While the real 'overlords' behind the teams, (Permanent Secretaries, Party Bosses, Financial Donors, Big Business) keep perverting the 'Will of the People' as they know better... arrogant @#$(censored)%^&*
'Unlawful' but 'Legal' as the Crown, Courts, Members of Parliament all go along with the charade, as it is very profitable and hard for 'the docile People' to stop or correct.
A few are aware, try to get remedy, but are kept occupied, enslaved, submissive by false ideas, fines, legal threats, financial ruin etc.
It takes considerable effort, time and money to challenge the system... ask any robo-debt survivor, and after a Royal Commission, in the sealled section, no one is held accountable for wilful Manslaughter; and the Political Class wonder why 'the People' do not trust them.
Parliament:
The 'Rule of Law', does not apply to me, but does to thee!
If this is true, then there is no 'Rule of Law' but a 'Rule by Tyrants', masquerading as representatives
and in excess of Power, whom should be arrested, jailed, and keys thrown away; or at least 'laugh at' and ignored;
We could all do that, except they have their hands deep in our pockets.
Today '2026' the system is designed to follow the 'Mafia' model, make it 'cheaper to pay up', shut up, get-a-long or suffer the consequences. It is all 'so wrong' and they know it!
e.g. Ongoing legal battles UK's Tommy Robinson; Australians, Julian Assange, Daniel Duggan, David McBride and many many more are fighting in the legal system, which is slow, expensive, and time consuming process to frustrate all... so viva the new Glorious Revolution!
